Very interesting! re the OxCGRT data at a glance, the main focus of discriminatory vaccination policies is 'passports' (aka "the vaccinated economy" or "public space mandates") as opposed to employment mandates, correct?
Thanks. Yes, that's correct re OxCGRT and therefore our focus too. I would explain it from the perspective of differential access restrictions, e.g. to schools, events, transit. Workplace closing C2 is about sectors being open/closed for unvaccinated workers, but the details of employment mandates are better reflected through the indicator V4, see pages 51-52 and then 70-71 of the Hale et al. (2023) working paper, https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-06/BSG-WP-2020-032-v15.pdf. That indicator is something we might look into next, since employment mandates affected us along with campus staff and contractors, and even students looking for co-op placements....
Thank you for the reply. This is interesting because in Australia, for example, the 'academic experts' in so-called 'vaccine hesitancy' have demonstrated that vaccine passports had very little impact on shifting the non-compliance of 'refusers'. The only policy which had an impact on this group was employment mandates (which would encompass student enrollment mandates) - ie. depriving people of their livelihood/ earning capacity. (The term "workplace mandate" / campus mandate was demonstrably untrue, as those who could work or study 100% remotely were likewise mandated.)
I’m working on data currently from a survey of teachers & nurses who were fired from their jobs in NZ during the mandate era (many have been unable or unwilling to return to these sectors since). I would welcome an opportunity for a discussion (webinar?) to share our knowledge?
Hi Ursula - the info in the comment actually not an area of research/ knowledge beyond a couple of publicly available reviews of 'vaccine hesitancy'... a huge area of well-funded "study", it seems!
Ursula, have a look at Dr. Claudia Chaufan's multiple publications about the impact of healthcare sector (and also postsecondary!) mandates in Canada, https://recover19.org/publications/. There are 1-2 additional, unpublished preprints on Claudia's osf.io profile, I believe.
re the Chaufan publication "COVID-19 vaccination decisions and impacts of vaccine mandates: a cross sectional survey of healthcare workers in Ontario, Canada" - Table 3 Personal impact of vaccination policies (p 11)...
This data is a reminder that the desired "goal" of employment mandates according to the aforementioned experts was achieved: The mandates were intended to be maximally punitive and permanent across multiple domains.
Very useful - thanks!
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/government-docs-from-2002-reveal-20-year-plan-to-alter-evolution-with-nanotechnology/
https://odysee.com/@Argusfest:b/Alison_Nano:e
https://rumble.com/v6ishsj-394359571.html
https://x.com/TLAVagabond/status/1894447901201375472
https://rumble.com/v6r69j6-scamdemic-exposed-part-19.html
Very interesting! re the OxCGRT data at a glance, the main focus of discriminatory vaccination policies is 'passports' (aka "the vaccinated economy" or "public space mandates") as opposed to employment mandates, correct?
Thanks. Yes, that's correct re OxCGRT and therefore our focus too. I would explain it from the perspective of differential access restrictions, e.g. to schools, events, transit. Workplace closing C2 is about sectors being open/closed for unvaccinated workers, but the details of employment mandates are better reflected through the indicator V4, see pages 51-52 and then 70-71 of the Hale et al. (2023) working paper, https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-06/BSG-WP-2020-032-v15.pdf. That indicator is something we might look into next, since employment mandates affected us along with campus staff and contractors, and even students looking for co-op placements....
https://rumble.com/v6ishsj-394359571.html
https://odysee.com/@Argusfest:b/Alison_Nano:e
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/government-docs-from-2002-reveal-20-year-plan-to-alter-evolution-with-nanotechnology/
Thank you for the reply. This is interesting because in Australia, for example, the 'academic experts' in so-called 'vaccine hesitancy' have demonstrated that vaccine passports had very little impact on shifting the non-compliance of 'refusers'. The only policy which had an impact on this group was employment mandates (which would encompass student enrollment mandates) - ie. depriving people of their livelihood/ earning capacity. (The term "workplace mandate" / campus mandate was demonstrably untrue, as those who could work or study 100% remotely were likewise mandated.)
I’m working on data currently from a survey of teachers & nurses who were fired from their jobs in NZ during the mandate era (many have been unable or unwilling to return to these sectors since). I would welcome an opportunity for a discussion (webinar?) to share our knowledge?
Hi Ursula - the info in the comment actually not an area of research/ knowledge beyond a couple of publicly available reviews of 'vaccine hesitancy'... a huge area of well-funded "study", it seems!
See Elizabeth Hart's substack for deep dives on the topic: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/
Thanks. Will look. I’m in regular contact with Elizabeth, thanks.
Ursula, have a look at Dr. Claudia Chaufan's multiple publications about the impact of healthcare sector (and also postsecondary!) mandates in Canada, https://recover19.org/publications/. There are 1-2 additional, unpublished preprints on Claudia's osf.io profile, I believe.
Interesting links, Claus.
re the Chaufan publication "COVID-19 vaccination decisions and impacts of vaccine mandates: a cross sectional survey of healthcare workers in Ontario, Canada" - Table 3 Personal impact of vaccination policies (p 11)...
This data is a reminder that the desired "goal" of employment mandates according to the aforementioned experts was achieved: The mandates were intended to be maximally punitive and permanent across multiple domains.